header-logo header-logo

The claim game

23 September 2011 / David Greene
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Opinion , Fees , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

David Greene ponders what is ahead for the personal injury claims industry following the referral fee ban

The last major piece of the Jackson proposals is, somewhat unexpectedly, slipping into place with the banning of referral fees for personal injury (see The death of referral fees). The concept of a ban had been gathering political momentum over the past few months since the initial announcement of the implementation of other Jackson reforms. A variety of stakeholders with their own agendas joined the hubbub. No doubt the ban will produce some radical changes to the accident industry.

There is somewhat of a knee-jerk reaction shared, I am sure by many of us, that paying for claims is morally and practically repugnant but will the ban meet the expressed desires of the proponents?

Waiting game

The parliamentary under-secretary of state for justice, Jonathan Djanogly, initially said that the government would wait and see on the development of alternative business structures (ABSs) this autumn and the effect they would have on the market.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll