header-logo header-logo

23 September 2011 / David Greene
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Opinion , Fees , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The claim game

David Greene ponders what is ahead for the personal injury claims industry following the referral fee ban

The last major piece of the Jackson proposals is, somewhat unexpectedly, slipping into place with the banning of referral fees for personal injury (see The death of referral fees). The concept of a ban had been gathering political momentum over the past few months since the initial announcement of the implementation of other Jackson reforms. A variety of stakeholders with their own agendas joined the hubbub. No doubt the ban will produce some radical changes to the accident industry.

There is somewhat of a knee-jerk reaction shared, I am sure by many of us, that paying for claims is morally and practically repugnant but will the ban meet the expressed desires of the proponents?

Waiting game

The parliamentary under-secretary of state for justice, Jonathan Djanogly, initially said that the government would wait and see on the development of alternative business structures (ABSs) this autumn and the effect they would have on the market.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll