header-logo header-logo

23 September 2011 / David Greene
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Opinion , Fees , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The claim game

David Greene ponders what is ahead for the personal injury claims industry following the referral fee ban

The last major piece of the Jackson proposals is, somewhat unexpectedly, slipping into place with the banning of referral fees for personal injury (see The death of referral fees). The concept of a ban had been gathering political momentum over the past few months since the initial announcement of the implementation of other Jackson reforms. A variety of stakeholders with their own agendas joined the hubbub. No doubt the ban will produce some radical changes to the accident industry.

There is somewhat of a knee-jerk reaction shared, I am sure by many of us, that paying for claims is morally and practically repugnant but will the ban meet the expressed desires of the proponents?

Waiting game

The parliamentary under-secretary of state for justice, Jonathan Djanogly, initially said that the government would wait and see on the development of alternative business structures (ABSs) this autumn and the effect they would have on the market.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll