header-logo header-logo

03 June 2016
Issue: 7701 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Claims management DBAs

Is a damages-based agreement enforceable where it has been made between a costs management company and a child’s litigation friend which would have been enforceable if the litigation friend had made it with a lawyer? If so, is it a proper exercise of the court’s discretion on an approval hearing to order that the amount due to the company be paid out of the child’s damages?

There may be a liability to pay a percentage of damages for claims management services (within the meaning of s 4(2)(b) of the Compensation Act 2006) on the part of the person who has instructed the claims management company. However, that would not be a liability of the child and the court might well refuse to approve any part of the child’s damages being used to satisfy the litigation friend’s liability of this kind. In any event, the damages-based agreement could be unenforceable: it is not unknown for an agreement to provide for a 25% share of personal injury damages without credit being given for the costs to be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll