header-logo header-logo

18 May 2020
Issue: 7887 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Clarke Willmott LLP—Clare Webb

Firm hires family law partner
Clarke Willmott LLP has announced that a new family law specialist has joined the firm as a partner in its Bristol office.


Clare Webb specialises in divorce and advises on all matters arising from a couple’s separation, including complex financial and children issues.

Clare has a particular interest in helping clients with family businesses and properties abroad. She also assists those who wish to protect and preserve their assets prior to entering a marriage or cohabiting relationship.

A qualified collaborative lawyer, Clare is also a committee member of Bath Resolution, a committee member of Bristol Collaborative Pod and a member of Bristol Resolution.

Gareth Schofield, head of the Bristol office family team, said: ‘We are delighted to have Clare on board. Our family team continues to attract significant work and Clare’s expertise will allow us to continue to provide and expand the services we have become known for. Clare’s background as a collaborative lawyer is a great asset and her sensitive and pragmatic approach to clients is welcomed.

‘A high percentage of Clare’s work arises from referrals from past clients who have first-hand experience of her advice, support and professionalism.’

Clare said: ‘A relationship breakdown is one of the most challenging and emotional times in a person’s life. The way in which separation and divorce is dealt with can have a significant impact on not only the individual client but also the children of the family.

‘I want to help my clients resolve their issues in a constructive and conciliatory way. I think it’s important to take into account the long-term hopes and aspirations of the family as a whole, while at the same time, protecting my clients’ interests.

‘I strive to help clients reach out of court settlements where possible. I like to empower clients to make their own decisions and help them find creative solutions that fulfil their needs and those of the family.’

Issue: 7887 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll