header-logo header-logo

Cloak & dagger in the Court of Protection?

02 December 2022 / Laura Davidson
Issue: 8005 / Categories: Features , Court of Protection , Mental health
printer mail-detail
102822
Closed proceedings & covert medication. In the first of a two-part series, Dr Laura Davidson asks if the Court of Protection has retreated to the realm of secrecy
  • In closed Court of Protection proceedings excluding her mother who was a party, the covert administration of hormone medication was authorised to a young woman.
  • The case raises multiple serious concerns, including around lack of disclosure and the right to family life.

There have been some extraordinary goings-on in the Court of Protection of late. In Re A (Covert Medication: Closed Proceedings), within the case A Council v A (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) and others [2022] EWCOP 44, a single judgment was published containing Part One (following a closed hearing on 15 September 2022 to which B was not a party) and Part Two relating to an open hearing involving all parties from 20 to 22 September 2022. A prior judgment of Judge Moir was also published simultaneously (The Local Authority v A &

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll