header-logo header-logo

Collective proceedings orders: the story so far…

11 February 2022 / Caroline Harbord , Candice Johnson
Issue: 7966 / Categories: Features , Collective action
printer mail-detail
71831
With the floodgates beginning to open, Caroline Harbord & Candice Johnson examine the first collective competition claims under the opt-out regime
  • An overview of the opt-out group litigation regime, and a summary of the key practical takeaways arising from each of the recent decisions on collective proceedings orders, from the perspective of claimants, lawyers and litigation funders.

2021 heralded a period of unprecedented excitement in the sphere of collective competition claims.

In August 2021, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) certified the first ever collective proceedings order (CPO), permitting Walter Merricks to pursue an opt-out group claim against Mastercard for established breaches of competition law. Mr Merricks is now authorised as class representative on behalf of 46.2 million potential claimants in a claim valued at a whopping £13.8bn.

In the weeks that followed, the CAT certified two further CPOs in multi-million-pound claims against both BT and two train operating companies (namely First MTR and Stagecoach). These decisions had been put on hold pending the Merricks judgment, and represent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll