header-logo header-logo

11 February 2022 / Caroline Harbord , Candice Johnson
Issue: 7966 / Categories: Features , Collective action
printer mail-detail

Collective proceedings orders: the story so far…

71831
With the floodgates beginning to open, Caroline Harbord & Candice Johnson examine the first collective competition claims under the opt-out regime
  • An overview of the opt-out group litigation regime, and a summary of the key practical takeaways arising from each of the recent decisions on collective proceedings orders, from the perspective of claimants, lawyers and litigation funders.

2021 heralded a period of unprecedented excitement in the sphere of collective competition claims.

In August 2021, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) certified the first ever collective proceedings order (CPO), permitting Walter Merricks to pursue an opt-out group claim against Mastercard for established breaches of competition law. Mr Merricks is now authorised as class representative on behalf of 46.2 million potential claimants in a claim valued at a whopping £13.8bn.

In the weeks that followed, the CAT certified two further CPOs in multi-million-pound claims against both BT and two train operating companies (namely First MTR and Stagecoach). These decisions had been put on hold pending the Merricks judgment, and represent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll