In combat

04 July 2013 / Robert Weir KC

Issue: 7567 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights

Robert Weir QC reports on the Snatch Land Rover case

Can soldiers or their families sue the Ministry of Defence (MoD) for a failure to provide them with appropriate equipment and training or for decisions made on the ground when, as a result, they are injured or killed in the course of active operations? Does this raise the spectre of soldiers obtaining injunctions against their commanders and refusing to go into battle on the basis that their human rights would be breached? Would this inevitably lead to defensive soldiering and impede the way in which decisions were made by politicians and military commanders in the national interest?

In Smith and others v Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41, [2013] All ER (D) 167 (Jun), the Supreme Court had to tackle these issues when deciding whether to strike out claims brought for breach of Art 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the right to life) and in negligence by families of soldiers killed in Iraq in Snatch Land Rovers by explosions

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

In combat

Robert Weir QC reports on the Snatch Land Rover case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Trans pool player loses discrimination fight

Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Fraud claims climb as courts brace for AI threats

Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes

NLJ this week: Traders’ convictions quashed in Libor shock

The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement

NLJ this week: Small firms call for tech clarity as AI looms

Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: AI boom collides with courtroom reality

Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ

Error message

In combat

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan