header-logo header-logo

13 May 2016 / Greville Healey , Jamie Sutherland
Issue: 7698 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Property
printer mail-detail

Commercial & competitive

nlj_7698_sutherland

Greville Healey & Jamie Sutherland consider EU competition law & retail leases

Section 2(1) of the Competition Act 1998 (the 1998 Act) prohibits agreements, decisions and practices which have as their “object or effect” the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the UK, unless they are exempt under s 9. This is defined by s 2(8) as “the Chapter I prohibition”. Until 6 April 2011, land agreements were excluded from the scope of the Ch I prohibition, but that exclusion was revoked by the Competition Act 1998 (Land Agreements Exclusion Revocation) Order 2010 (SI 2010/1709) (the 2010 Order). Accordingly, land agreements, including leases, are now subject to the Ch I prohibition.

In March 2011, just before the 2010 Order came into force, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) published a guideline (the guideline) on the application of competition law to land agreements (OFT1280a). Since the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) assumed many of the functions of the OFT in April 2014, it has retained the guideline, but with a health warning that it has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll