header-logo header-logo

13 May 2016 / Greville Healey , Jamie Sutherland
Issue: 7698 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Property
printer mail-detail

Commercial & competitive

nlj_7698_sutherland

Greville Healey & Jamie Sutherland consider EU competition law & retail leases

Section 2(1) of the Competition Act 1998 (the 1998 Act) prohibits agreements, decisions and practices which have as their “object or effect” the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the UK, unless they are exempt under s 9. This is defined by s 2(8) as “the Chapter I prohibition”. Until 6 April 2011, land agreements were excluded from the scope of the Ch I prohibition, but that exclusion was revoked by the Competition Act 1998 (Land Agreements Exclusion Revocation) Order 2010 (SI 2010/1709) (the 2010 Order). Accordingly, land agreements, including leases, are now subject to the Ch I prohibition.

In March 2011, just before the 2010 Order came into force, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) published a guideline (the guideline) on the application of competition law to land agreements (OFT1280a). Since the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) assumed many of the functions of the OFT in April 2014, it has retained the guideline, but with a health warning that it has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll