header-logo header-logo

13 May 2016 / Greville Healey , Jamie Sutherland
Issue: 7698 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Property
printer mail-detail

Commercial & competitive

nlj_7698_sutherland

Greville Healey & Jamie Sutherland consider EU competition law & retail leases

Section 2(1) of the Competition Act 1998 (the 1998 Act) prohibits agreements, decisions and practices which have as their “object or effect” the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the UK, unless they are exempt under s 9. This is defined by s 2(8) as “the Chapter I prohibition”. Until 6 April 2011, land agreements were excluded from the scope of the Ch I prohibition, but that exclusion was revoked by the Competition Act 1998 (Land Agreements Exclusion Revocation) Order 2010 (SI 2010/1709) (the 2010 Order). Accordingly, land agreements, including leases, are now subject to the Ch I prohibition.

In March 2011, just before the 2010 Order came into force, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) published a guideline (the guideline) on the application of competition law to land agreements (OFT1280a). Since the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) assumed many of the functions of the OFT in April 2014, it has retained the guideline, but with a health warning that it has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll