header-logo header-logo

Commercial & competitive

13 May 2016 / Greville Healey , Jamie Sutherland
Issue: 7698 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Property
printer mail-detail
nlj_7698_sutherland

Greville Healey & Jamie Sutherland consider EU competition law & retail leases

Section 2(1) of the Competition Act 1998 (the 1998 Act) prohibits agreements, decisions and practices which have as their “object or effect” the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the UK, unless they are exempt under s 9. This is defined by s 2(8) as “the Chapter I prohibition”. Until 6 April 2011, land agreements were excluded from the scope of the Ch I prohibition, but that exclusion was revoked by the Competition Act 1998 (Land Agreements Exclusion Revocation) Order 2010 (SI 2010/1709) (the 2010 Order). Accordingly, land agreements, including leases, are now subject to the Ch I prohibition.

In March 2011, just before the 2010 Order came into force, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) published a guideline (the guideline) on the application of competition law to land agreements (OFT1280a). Since the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) assumed many of the functions of the OFT in April 2014, it has retained the guideline, but with a health warning that it has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll