header-logo header-logo

On common ground

30 November 2012 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Alec Samuels examines the arguments for and against fencing common land

The common may not be fenced without the consent of the secretary of state (Commons Act 2006 (CA 2006), s 38). Other consents may be required from eg, the owner and planning authority. The prohibition covers “restricted works” which prevent or impede access, such as fencing or ditches. Resurfacing with certain material is also prohibited, except for repair/maintenance of an existing surface.

Works for the installation of electronic communications apparatus for the purposes of an electronic communications code network are permitted under s 38(b)(d) (above ground masts would require planning permission).

Land is common land if it is registered or otherwise protected, eg, under a scheme of management under the Metropolitan Commons Act 1866 or the Commons Act 1899.

The New Forest is governed by its own traditional and statutory regime, responsibility being vested in the Verderers and the New Forest National Park Authority. Ponies stray onto roads and into villages. The A31 and the A35 are busy roads traversing the New Forest,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll