header-logo header-logo

A common intention?

16 March 2012 / Rebecca Carlyon
Issue: 7505 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Rebecca Carlyon notes the intricacies of beneficial interest relating to a foreign divorce

The Chancery Division was required to determine issues relating to the beneficial interest in a London property arising from divorce proceedings in Israel between Israeli nationals resident in Israel (Liora Shama, the wife (W), and Meir Shami, the husband (H)), and involving the husband’s brother (Eyal Shami (B)) (Shami v Shami and another [2012] Lexis Citation 16). In December 1989 H purchased the lease of a property in London for £110,000 in his sole name, with the aid of a mortgage with Halifax in the sum of £83,000. H and B stated that the remaining £27,000 plus legal costs were paid by B.

H accrued substantial debts, one to a London supplier and the other an overdraft with NatWest.
In June 1995 H issued proceedings for divorce in Israel in the rabbinical courts. The final decree was pronounced in 2003.

In August 1995 H executed a legal charge in B’s favour, which was registered, of the leasehold interest in the flat

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll