header-logo header-logo

A common intention?

16 March 2012 / Rebecca Carlyon
Issue: 7505 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Rebecca Carlyon notes the intricacies of beneficial interest relating to a foreign divorce

The Chancery Division was required to determine issues relating to the beneficial interest in a London property arising from divorce proceedings in Israel between Israeli nationals resident in Israel (Liora Shama, the wife (W), and Meir Shami, the husband (H)), and involving the husband’s brother (Eyal Shami (B)) (Shami v Shami and another [2012] Lexis Citation 16). In December 1989 H purchased the lease of a property in London for £110,000 in his sole name, with the aid of a mortgage with Halifax in the sum of £83,000. H and B stated that the remaining £27,000 plus legal costs were paid by B.

H accrued substantial debts, one to a London supplier and the other an overdraft with NatWest.
In June 1995 H issued proceedings for divorce in Israel in the rabbinical courts. The final decree was pronounced in 2003.

In August 1995 H executed a legal charge in B’s favour, which was registered, of the leasehold interest in the flat

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll