header-logo header-logo

A common intention?

16 March 2012 / Rebecca Carlyon
Issue: 7505 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Rebecca Carlyon notes the intricacies of beneficial interest relating to a foreign divorce

The Chancery Division was required to determine issues relating to the beneficial interest in a London property arising from divorce proceedings in Israel between Israeli nationals resident in Israel (Liora Shama, the wife (W), and Meir Shami, the husband (H)), and involving the husband’s brother (Eyal Shami (B)) (Shami v Shami and another [2012] Lexis Citation 16). In December 1989 H purchased the lease of a property in London for £110,000 in his sole name, with the aid of a mortgage with Halifax in the sum of £83,000. H and B stated that the remaining £27,000 plus legal costs were paid by B.

H accrued substantial debts, one to a London supplier and the other an overdraft with NatWest.
In June 1995 H issued proceedings for divorce in Israel in the rabbinical courts. The final decree was pronounced in 2003.

In August 1995 H executed a legal charge in B’s favour, which was registered, of the leasehold interest in the flat

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll