header-logo header-logo

16 March 2012 / Rebecca Carlyon
Issue: 7505 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

A common intention?

Rebecca Carlyon notes the intricacies of beneficial interest relating to a foreign divorce

The Chancery Division was required to determine issues relating to the beneficial interest in a London property arising from divorce proceedings in Israel between Israeli nationals resident in Israel (Liora Shama, the wife (W), and Meir Shami, the husband (H)), and involving the husband’s brother (Eyal Shami (B)) (Shami v Shami and another [2012] Lexis Citation 16). In December 1989 H purchased the lease of a property in London for £110,000 in his sole name, with the aid of a mortgage with Halifax in the sum of £83,000. H and B stated that the remaining £27,000 plus legal costs were paid by B.

H accrued substantial debts, one to a London supplier and the other an overdraft with NatWest.
In June 1995 H issued proceedings for divorce in Israel in the rabbinical courts. The final decree was pronounced in 2003.

In August 1995 H executed a legal charge in B’s favour, which was registered, of the leasehold interest in the flat

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll