header-logo header-logo

Commons committee condemns legal aid reform

04 May 2007
Issue: 7271 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

The government’s plans for legal aid were dealt a serious blow this week after they were savaged by an influential parliamentary committee.

The Commons Constitutional Affairs Committee says it fears that if the proposed reforms to the legal aid system go ahead there is a serious risk for access to justice among the most vulnerable in society.

The move to competitive tendering among firms for legal aid contracts must be properly piloted before it is implemented, the committee says. It also calls on government to scrap the “transitional period” of fixed fees, claiming it could lead to significant cuts in income for many legal aid lawyers and prove to be unsustainable.

The committee attacked the government for penny-pinching in some ways yet failing to focus on areas where cost is actually increasing, namely crown court defence work and public law children cases.

Committee chair, Alan Beith MP, says: “The risks inherent in these largely untested and unpiloted reform plans might be justified were the whole system in utter crisis but large parts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll