header-logo header-logo

Commons committee condemns legal aid reform

04 May 2007
Issue: 7271 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

The government’s plans for legal aid were dealt a serious blow this week after they were savaged by an influential parliamentary committee.

The Commons Constitutional Affairs Committee says it fears that if the proposed reforms to the legal aid system go ahead there is a serious risk for access to justice among the most vulnerable in society.

The move to competitive tendering among firms for legal aid contracts must be properly piloted before it is implemented, the committee says. It also calls on government to scrap the “transitional period” of fixed fees, claiming it could lead to significant cuts in income for many legal aid lawyers and prove to be unsustainable.

The committee attacked the government for penny-pinching in some ways yet failing to focus on areas where cost is actually increasing, namely crown court defence work and public law children cases.

Committee chair, Alan Beith MP, says: “The risks inherent in these largely untested and unpiloted reform plans might be justified were the whole system in utter crisis but large parts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll