header-logo header-logo

Community care law update

13 April 2008 / Ed Mitchell , Clive Lewis KC
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Features , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

Without notice applications, Deprivation of liberty, Local government ombudsman decisions, Mental Capacity Act 2005

PROTECTION OF VULNERABLE ADULTS

B Borough Council v S [2006] EWHC 2584 (Fam), [2006] All ER (D) 281 (Oct)

There is increasing awareness that the High Court can be used to authorise/validate actions taken by local authorities to protect vulnerable adults. This arises from what is termed the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction to declare that, under the common law doctrine of necessity, it would be lawful for an authority to enforce care arrangements for a vulnerable adult without the mental capacity to make valid care decisions. Before making any such declaration, and any associated injunction, the High Court must be satisfied that what is proposed is in the adult’s best interests.

Without notice application

These cases are often associated with care crises as a result of which local authorities wish to intervene without letting family members know their plans for fear they would be impeded. This leads authorities to apply to the High Court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll