header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
08 November 2007 / Ed Mitchell
Issue: 7296 / Categories: Features , Community care
printer mail-detail

Community Care Law Update

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

SLIPPERY FLOORS >>
OMBUDSMAN Decisions >>
VULNERABLE ASYLUM SEEKERS >>

CARE HOMES

As a result of the Court of Appeal’s decision in Ellis v Bristol City Council [2007] EWCA Civ 685, [2007] All ER (D) 76 (Jul) shiny smooth floors should become a thing of the past in those care homes in which liquid spillages frequently occur. The case was brought by a care assistant, Ms E, who had worked in a care home for older persons with mental illness, many of whom were incontinent. She fell and injured herself having slipped in a pool of urine left in a corridor by a resident. She brought a compensation claim based on an alleged breach by the home of the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare Regulations)1992 (SI 1992/3004) (the regulations).
Corridors in the care home were made of shiny smooth vinyl. They were washed daily and buffed with a machine. They would become slippery when wet. Non-slip mats were placed on those sections of the corridors upon which urination most often occurred. In the case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll