header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
27 September 2007 / Ed Mitchell , Clive Lewis
Issue: 7290 / Categories: Features , Community care
printer mail-detail

Community care law update

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

PAYING FOR LONG TERM CARE
HUMAN RIGHTS AND PRIVATE CARE HOMES
PROTECTING VULNERABLE ADULTS

ACCIDENT VICTIMS’ LONG TERM CARE

Care costs money. The greater the care needs, the greater the cost. Where the care needs arise because of another’s negligence, who should pay? Most would say the tortfeasor. However, the complex interaction of a number of legal rules sometimes leads to local social services authorities having to foot the bill. Accordingly, in these cases massive resources are required in order to provide lifetime care for a person who has suffered catastrophic injuries in an accident and local authorities often find themselves shocked to learn that they, rather than the tortfeasor, are expected to find the resources.
Case law to date has focused on accident victims who require residential care. The Court of Appeal’s decision in Crofton v NHS Litigation Authority [2007] EWCA Civ 71, [2007] All ER (D) 106 (Feb) however, concerned victims who require domiciliary care. The decision illustrates that the same transfer of responsibility from tortfeasor to local authority is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
NLJ this week: Diamond rings and broken promises

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: The battle over medical report fees intensifies
Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll