header-logo header-logo

28 April 2011
Issue: 7463 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Community legal service funding—Costs out of community legal service fund—Jurisdiction

F and others v Legal Services Commission [2011] EWHC 899 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 95 (Apr)

Queen’s Bench Division, Sharp J, 8 Apr 2011

Whether someone will suffer financial hardship if their costs are not reimbursed by the losing party is a question of fact and degree; there is no absolute standard by which that can be judged

Robert Marven (instructed by Legal & Governance Team, Legal Services Commission) for the LSC. Guy Mansfield QC (instructed by Kingsley Napley LLP (KN)) for the interveners.

The underlying proceedings concerned a claim for ancillary relief, in which it was argued by the applicant, P, that the respondent, R, was the true beneficial owner of a number of properties and shares. A number of family members intervened in the proceedings. The same firm of solicitors (KN) acted for all the interveners, but had a separate retainer from each. The applicant was publicly funded throughout the proceedings. R and the interveners were non-funded parties. In September 2006, KN wrote on behalf

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll