header-logo header-logo

Company

14 April 2011
Issue: 7461 + 7462 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Farstad Supply A/S v Enviroco Ltd [2011] UKSC 16, [2011] All ER (D) 55 (Apr)

The definition of “member” in s 22 of the Companies Act 1985 reflected a fundamental principle of UK company law, namely that, except where express provision was made to the contrary, the person on the register of the members was the member to the exclusion of any other person, unless and until the register was rectified.

The legislation made it clear that the member was the person on the register, and where it was necessary to apply the legislation to persons who were not on the register, special provision was made. 

Section 736A(6) of the 1985 Act provided that “rights held” by a person as nominee for another “shall be treated as held by the other”, and s 736A(7) provided in principle that rights attached to shares held by way of security “shall be treated as held by the person providing the security”.

The terms were substantially the same as paras 7 and 8 of Sch 10A to the 1985 Act,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll