header-logo header-logo

Company

01 February 2013
Issue: 7546 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Eckerle and others v Wickeder Westfalenstahl GmbH and another [2013] EWHC 68 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 150 (Jan)

Section 98 of the Companies Act 2006 dealt with the situation where a special resolution by a public company to be re-registered as a private limited company had been passed. It allowed certain persons to apply to the court for the cancellation of the resolution. On its true construction, s 98 did not apply to the holders of economic interest in shares and did not enable the holder of the ultimate economic interest to exercise rights otherwise vested in a member to protect the economic value of the shares. Membership, not ownership of an economic interest, defined the class from whom interest might be acquired of dissentient members. It was settled law that registration conferred title. Without registration, an applicant was not the holder of a share or a member of the company: the share has not been issued to him. No person could be a shareholder until he was registered. A person who was not a shareholder by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll