header-logo header-logo

Company

01 February 2013
Issue: 7546 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Eckerle and others v Wickeder Westfalenstahl GmbH and another [2013] EWHC 68 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 150 (Jan)

Section 98 of the Companies Act 2006 dealt with the situation where a special resolution by a public company to be re-registered as a private limited company had been passed. It allowed certain persons to apply to the court for the cancellation of the resolution. On its true construction, s 98 did not apply to the holders of economic interest in shares and did not enable the holder of the ultimate economic interest to exercise rights otherwise vested in a member to protect the economic value of the shares. Membership, not ownership of an economic interest, defined the class from whom interest might be acquired of dissentient members. It was settled law that registration conferred title. Without registration, an applicant was not the holder of a share or a member of the company: the share has not been issued to him. No person could be a shareholder until he was registered. A person who was not a shareholder by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll