header-logo header-logo

02 February 2012
Issue: 7499 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Company

Re Virtualpurple Professional Services Limited [2011] EWHC 3487 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 149 (Jan)

Reading paras 26 and 28 of Sch B1 of the Insolvency Rules 1986 (SI 1986/1925) consistently with other provisions and with an eye on the purpose for which they had been enacted, directors could proceed to make an immediate appointment without giving “notice of intention” to the company. As a matter of strict construction there was a strong indication that the draftsman had contemplated two scenarios.

One in which notice of intention had to be given to a qualifying chargeholder and another in which no such notice had to be given. Paragraph 30 of Sch B1 dealt with the contents of the statutory declaration that had to be contained in the prescribed form “in a case in which no person is entitled to notice of intention to appoint under paragraph 26(1) and paragraph 28 therefore does not apply”. That indicated that para 28 was intended only to apply where there was someone who was entitled to appoint an administrative receiver of the company

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths strengthens national tax team with Heather Gibson appointment

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

NEWS
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
A client cannot use a costs assessment to investigate whether their solicitor received commission on an after-the-event (ATE) insurance premium, the Court of Appeal has held
Law firms cannot be compelled to disclose documents protected by unwaived legal professional privilege (LPP) during misconduct investigations, the High Court has clarified
Solicitors have urged regulators not to impose unnecessary cost and complexity on third-party litigation funding
International demand for UK legal services is surging, with exports at record levels, according to Law Society research
back-to-top-scroll