header-logo header-logo

07 April 2017
Issue: 7741 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Company

R (on the application of Unaenergy Group Holding Pte Ltd and others) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2017] EWHC 600 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 189 (Mar)

The Administrative Court dismissed the claimants’ application for judicial review of the decision of the defendant Serious Fraud Office to issue a letter of request (the LOR) to authorities in Monaco for assistance in dealing with allegations of corruption. The court held that, among other things, the SFO had not been under a duty to the claimants to comply with a “heightened procedural obligation” when issuing the LOR, and the issuing of the LOR had not constituted an unlawful fishing expedition.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
The controversial Mazur ruling, which caused widespread uncertainty about the role of non-solicitors in litigation work, has been overturned on appeal
Two landmark social media cases in the US could influence social media regulation in the UK, lawyers predict
Barristers have urged the government to set up Nightingale-style specialist courts, with jury trials, to prioritise rape, sexual assault and domestic abuse trials
Victims of violent crimes who suffer life-changing injuries receive less than half the financial support today than those in the 1990s, according to a senior personal injury lawyer
Rising numbers of cases, an increase in litigants in person and an overall lack of investment is piling pressure on the family court, the Law Society has warned
back-to-top-scroll