header-logo header-logo

23 June 2017
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Company

Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (UK) v Her Majesty’s Attorney General and others [2017] EWHC 1379 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 67 (Jun)

The Chancery Division approved a grant of US$360m from the claimant charity, The Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (UK) (CIFF), which was founded by Sir Christopher Hohn and his ex-wife, Ms Cooper, to Big Win Philanthropy, a charity founded by Ms Cooper. The court held that members of a charity owed fiduciary duties to act in the best interests of that charity, including a charitable company limited by guarantee, and that the grant, which was approved following the couple’s divorce, would be in the best interests of CIFF. Among other things, it held that the proposed grant would constitute a payment as consideration for, or in connection with, Ms Cooper’s loss of office, within the proper meaning of s 215(1) of the Companies Act 2006, so as to require the approval of CIFF’s members, under s 217 of that Act. It ordered that, subject the consent of the Charity Commission and CIFF’s memorandum, the grant had to be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll