header-logo header-logo

18 January 2007 / Ling Ong
Issue: 7256 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Company abuse

Ling Ong analyses an exceptional case of attribution in the context of an insurance policy exclusion clause

It is often unclear when acts of individuals can be attributed to an insured, but the Court of Appeal addressed this in the context of an exclusion clause under a liability policy in KR v Royal & Sun Alliance plc [2006] EWCA Civ 1454, [2006] All ER (D) 42 (Nov).

The action arose from various claims concerning physical and sexual abuse suffered by residents in children’s homes, in north Wales, owned and operated by Bryn Alyn Community Holdings Ltd. The homes were originally started up by John Allen. After the company took over the homes, Allen remained a director and chief executive until his resignation in October 1991; he was the majority shareholder until 1989.

In 1995, Allen was convicted of six offences of indecent assault on young male residents between 1972 and 1983. Civil proceedings were subsequently brought against the company by a number of ex-residents claiming abuse—in some cases by Allen, in other cases by heads

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll