header-logo header-logo

18 January 2007 / Ling Ong
Issue: 7256 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Company abuse

Ling Ong analyses an exceptional case of attribution in the context of an insurance policy exclusion clause

It is often unclear when acts of individuals can be attributed to an insured, but the Court of Appeal addressed this in the context of an exclusion clause under a liability policy in KR v Royal & Sun Alliance plc [2006] EWCA Civ 1454, [2006] All ER (D) 42 (Nov).

The action arose from various claims concerning physical and sexual abuse suffered by residents in children’s homes, in north Wales, owned and operated by Bryn Alyn Community Holdings Ltd. The homes were originally started up by John Allen. After the company took over the homes, Allen remained a director and chief executive until his resignation in October 1991; he was the majority shareholder until 1989.

In 1995, Allen was convicted of six offences of indecent assault on young male residents between 1972 and 1983. Civil proceedings were subsequently brought against the company by a number of ex-residents claiming abuse—in some cases by Allen, in other cases by heads

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll