header-logo header-logo

Company—Execution of documents—Signature

05 May 2011
Issue: 7464 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Williams and others v Redcard Ltd and others [2011] EWCA Civ 466, [2011] All ER (D) 214 (Apr)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Mummery, Hughes and Black LJJ, 20 Apr 2011

Under s 44 of the Companies Act 2006, a company document may be validly signed by signatories acting for the company even though the execution did not take place either with the common seal of the company or by expressly being signed “for or on behalf of the company”.

Timothy Dutton (instructed by Bircham Dyson Bell LLP) for the claimants. Evan Ashfield (instructed by Davies Battersby) for the defendants.

The defendant company was named as a party to a contract of July 2008 and a supplementary agreement of January 2009 (the agreement). The contracts included the sale of a residential property to the claimants. The agreement varied the completion date and confirmed the earlier contract in all other respects. The agreement bore various signatures under the words “Signed...seller”, including those of two individuals who were authorised signatories of the defendant. The documents did not bear

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Solicitors are installing panic buttons and thumb print scanners due to ‘systemic and rising’ intimidation including death and arson threats from clients
Ministers’ decision to scrap plans for their Labour manifesto pledge of day one protection from unfair dismissal was entirely predictable, employment lawyers have said
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll