header-logo header-logo

05 May 2011
Issue: 7464 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Company—Execution of documents—Signature

Williams and others v Redcard Ltd and others [2011] EWCA Civ 466, [2011] All ER (D) 214 (Apr)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Mummery, Hughes and Black LJJ, 20 Apr 2011

Under s 44 of the Companies Act 2006, a company document may be validly signed by signatories acting for the company even though the execution did not take place either with the common seal of the company or by expressly being signed “for or on behalf of the company”.

Timothy Dutton (instructed by Bircham Dyson Bell LLP) for the claimants. Evan Ashfield (instructed by Davies Battersby) for the defendants.

The defendant company was named as a party to a contract of July 2008 and a supplementary agreement of January 2009 (the agreement). The contracts included the sale of a residential property to the claimants. The agreement varied the completion date and confirmed the earlier contract in all other respects. The agreement bore various signatures under the words “Signed...seller”, including those of two individuals who were authorised signatories of the defendant. The documents did not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
Lawyers have been asked for their views on proposals to change the penalties for assaulting a police officer
back-to-top-scroll