header-logo header-logo

Company—Execution of documents—Signature

05 May 2011
Issue: 7464 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Williams and others v Redcard Ltd and others [2011] EWCA Civ 466, [2011] All ER (D) 214 (Apr)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Mummery, Hughes and Black LJJ, 20 Apr 2011

Under s 44 of the Companies Act 2006, a company document may be validly signed by signatories acting for the company even though the execution did not take place either with the common seal of the company or by expressly being signed “for or on behalf of the company”.

Timothy Dutton (instructed by Bircham Dyson Bell LLP) for the claimants. Evan Ashfield (instructed by Davies Battersby) for the defendants.

The defendant company was named as a party to a contract of July 2008 and a supplementary agreement of January 2009 (the agreement). The contracts included the sale of a residential property to the claimants. The agreement varied the completion date and confirmed the earlier contract in all other respects. The agreement bore various signatures under the words “Signed...seller”, including those of two individuals who were authorised signatories of the defendant. The documents did not bear

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll