header-logo header-logo

Compensation claims in danger

27 November 2008
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Personal injury

Personal injury lawyers have criticised Law Commission proposals they say will seriously undermine people’s right to compensation.

In a consultation paper that closed this month, the Law Commission set out plans which sought to balance “fairness to an aggrieved person with the need to promote “effective public administration”. However, the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) says the plans could allow public bodies to get away with negligence.

Amada Stevens, APIL president, says the proposals are not justified by current circumstance.

“Liability against public bodies is not expanding and we can find no clear rationale to justify radical reform of the law in relation to public bodies,” she says.

Stevens continues:
“Negligence which results in injury or death causes the same devastation irrespective of whether the defendant is a private individual or a public body, and the negligence test should not be tougher for one than the other.”

She says that changes to the law would mean that even in cases where fault had been clearly established against public bodies it would no

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll