header-logo header-logo

Compensation claims in danger

27 November 2008
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Personal injury

Personal injury lawyers have criticised Law Commission proposals they say will seriously undermine people’s right to compensation.

In a consultation paper that closed this month, the Law Commission set out plans which sought to balance “fairness to an aggrieved person with the need to promote “effective public administration”. However, the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) says the plans could allow public bodies to get away with negligence.

Amada Stevens, APIL president, says the proposals are not justified by current circumstance.

“Liability against public bodies is not expanding and we can find no clear rationale to justify radical reform of the law in relation to public bodies,” she says.

Stevens continues:
“Negligence which results in injury or death causes the same devastation irrespective of whether the defendant is a private individual or a public body, and the negligence test should not be tougher for one than the other.”

She says that changes to the law would mean that even in cases where fault had been clearly established against public bodies it would no

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll