header-logo header-logo

27 November 2008
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Compensation claims in danger

Personal injury

Personal injury lawyers have criticised Law Commission proposals they say will seriously undermine people’s right to compensation.

In a consultation paper that closed this month, the Law Commission set out plans which sought to balance “fairness to an aggrieved person with the need to promote “effective public administration”. However, the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) says the plans could allow public bodies to get away with negligence.

Amada Stevens, APIL president, says the proposals are not justified by current circumstance.

“Liability against public bodies is not expanding and we can find no clear rationale to justify radical reform of the law in relation to public bodies,” she says.

Stevens continues:
“Negligence which results in injury or death causes the same devastation irrespective of whether the defendant is a private individual or a public body, and the negligence test should not be tougher for one than the other.”

She says that changes to the law would mean that even in cases where fault had been clearly established against public bodies it would no

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll