header-logo header-logo

27 November 2008
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Compensation claims in danger

Personal injury

Personal injury lawyers have criticised Law Commission proposals they say will seriously undermine people’s right to compensation.

In a consultation paper that closed this month, the Law Commission set out plans which sought to balance “fairness to an aggrieved person with the need to promote “effective public administration”. However, the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) says the plans could allow public bodies to get away with negligence.

Amada Stevens, APIL president, says the proposals are not justified by current circumstance.

“Liability against public bodies is not expanding and we can find no clear rationale to justify radical reform of the law in relation to public bodies,” she says.

Stevens continues:
“Negligence which results in injury or death causes the same devastation irrespective of whether the defendant is a private individual or a public body, and the negligence test should not be tougher for one than the other.”

She says that changes to the law would mean that even in cases where fault had been clearly established against public bodies it would no

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll