header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Compensation orders: mapping the new into the old

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
31 March 2021 / David Miers
Issue: 7927 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Compensation
printer mail-detail
44729
David Miers considers a new approach to compensation orders in light of the Sentencing Act 2020
  • The Sentencing Act 2020 has consolidated the powers and duties contained in the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000, governing the imposition on convicted offenders of compensation orders to be paid to their victims.
  • Practitioners and, in particular, magistrates, should find the provisions regarding the making of compensation orders easier than was the case previously.

Sections 55 and 133-145 of the Sentencing Act 2020 (SA 2020) consolidate with minor amendments the powers and duties contained in sections 130-134 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 (PCC(S)A 2000), governing the imposition on convicted offenders of compensation orders to be paid to their victims (by SA 2020, s 2(1), anyone convicted of an offence on or after 1 December 2020 will be sentenced under the Sentencing Code, regardless of when they committed their offence). This article summarises the effect of the consolidation on the current law, with particular reference

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Law Society calls for clarity on AML
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: Turning corporate liability into opportunity
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
NLJ this week: A prince no more?
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
NLJ this week: Shareholder secrecy sunk
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
NLJ this week: The expanding remit of national security law
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll