header-logo header-logo

Compensation orders: mapping the new into the old

31 March 2021 / David Miers
Issue: 7927 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Compensation
printer mail-detail
44729
David Miers considers a new approach to compensation orders in light of the Sentencing Act 2020
  • The Sentencing Act 2020 has consolidated the powers and duties contained in the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000, governing the imposition on convicted offenders of compensation orders to be paid to their victims.
  • Practitioners and, in particular, magistrates, should find the provisions regarding the making of compensation orders easier than was the case previously.

Sections 55 and 133-145 of the Sentencing Act 2020 (SA 2020) consolidate with minor amendments the powers and duties contained in sections 130-134 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 (PCC(S)A 2000), governing the imposition on convicted offenders of compensation orders to be paid to their victims (by SA 2020, s 2(1), anyone convicted of an offence on or after 1 December 2020 will be sentenced under the Sentencing Code, regardless of when they committed their offence). This article summarises the effect of the consolidation on the current law, with particular reference

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll