header-logo header-logo

Competition

28 February 2014
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

British Telecommunicatons plc v Office of Communications [2014] EWCA Civ 133, [2014] All ER (D) 158 (Feb)

Section 316 of the Communications Act 2003 allowed Ofcom to impose conditions so as to ensure fair and effective competition in the wholesale and retail provision of licensed services to consumers generally. “Licensed services” in s 316(1) of the 2003 Act meant the services licensed by a licence issued under the Broadcasting Act 1990 (s 316(4)). Such licences related to the content of the services. The types of service that could be the subject of a BA licence included television licensable content services (TLCSs). When determining the scope of Ofcom’s jurisdiction to impose conditions in such licences, the fundamental question was “what is the scope of the words ‘in the provision of’ licensed services?” Given that it was Ofcom’s statutory duty to promote the interests of consumers in relevant markets and given that one of those relevant markets had to be pay TV (because that market was the subject of regulation under the Act) then it followed that the words “in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll