header-logo header-logo

Competition

28 February 2014
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

British Telecommunicatons plc v Office of Communications [2014] EWCA Civ 133, [2014] All ER (D) 158 (Feb)

Section 316 of the Communications Act 2003 allowed Ofcom to impose conditions so as to ensure fair and effective competition in the wholesale and retail provision of licensed services to consumers generally. “Licensed services” in s 316(1) of the 2003 Act meant the services licensed by a licence issued under the Broadcasting Act 1990 (s 316(4)). Such licences related to the content of the services. The types of service that could be the subject of a BA licence included television licensable content services (TLCSs). When determining the scope of Ofcom’s jurisdiction to impose conditions in such licences, the fundamental question was “what is the scope of the words ‘in the provision of’ licensed services?” Given that it was Ofcom’s statutory duty to promote the interests of consumers in relevant markets and given that one of those relevant markets had to be pay TV (because that market was the subject of regulation under the Act) then it followed that the words “in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll