header-logo header-logo

Compulsory reading

23 October 2009
Issue: 7390 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Anyone interested in the future of legal services or in the management of a law firm should grab a copy of Lord Hunt’s Review of the Regulation of Legal Services.

The review marks an important step in the development of the relationship between regulator and regulated. The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) faces numerous challenges over the next 18 months in responding to the implementation of the Legal Services Act 2007 and in licensing alternative business structures (ABSs).

The review is therefore a timely opportunity for the solicitors’ profession to take stock of its relationship with the SRA.

Lord Hunt makes 88 recommendations in the review. Their scope is immense, ranging from the mundane (printing credit card-sized reminders of the core principles) to the profound (a new form of self-regulation for solicitors’ firms). They are likely to upset, excite and baffle in equal measures.

While it is a difficult document to summarise, three main themes emerge.

The first could be described as: “Keeping an eye on the watchmen.” These are the group of recommendations that target the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll