header-logo header-logo

23 October 2009
Issue: 7390 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Compulsory reading

Anyone interested in the future of legal services or in the management of a law firm should grab a copy of Lord Hunt’s Review of the Regulation of Legal Services.

The review marks an important step in the development of the relationship between regulator and regulated. The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) faces numerous challenges over the next 18 months in responding to the implementation of the Legal Services Act 2007 and in licensing alternative business structures (ABSs).

The review is therefore a timely opportunity for the solicitors’ profession to take stock of its relationship with the SRA.

Lord Hunt makes 88 recommendations in the review. Their scope is immense, ranging from the mundane (printing credit card-sized reminders of the core principles) to the profound (a new form of self-regulation for solicitors’ firms). They are likely to upset, excite and baffle in equal measures.

While it is a difficult document to summarise, three main themes emerge.

The first could be described as: “Keeping an eye on the watchmen.” These are the group of recommendations that target the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll