header-logo header-logo

26 April 2012
Issue: 7511 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Confidential information

BUQ v HRE [2012] EWHC 774 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 78 (Apr)

It was established law that, when considering whether the publication of information which was said to be private should be permitted: (i) the first question to be considered was whether the claimant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of that information such that their rights under Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights were engaged; (ii) the second question was what the rights of the defendant were; and (iii) finally, the court had to weigh the rights claimed by the claimant against the rights of the other individuals concerned. In determining (i), the question was what a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities would feel if they were placed in the same position as the claimant and faced with the same publicity.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Shakespeare Martineau—David Vaughan

Shakespeare Martineau—David Vaughan

Shakespeare Martineau appoints new London office head as firm continues investment in capital

Browne Jacobson—Kevin Moore

Browne Jacobson—Kevin Moore

Browne Jacobson strengthens All-Island life sciences platform with appointment of leading Galway MedTech lawyer

Clarke Willmott—Latitude Law

Clarke Willmott—Latitude Law

National law firm strengthens commercial offering with acquisition of leading immigration practice

NEWS
Mr Justice Nicklin’s decision to order costs on an indemnity basis may be a ‘significant win’ but it’s still ‘far from game, set and match’ for Associated Newspapers, a former costs judge has said
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners
back-to-top-scroll