header-logo header-logo

21 October 2010
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Conflict of laws

Angara Maritime Ltd v Oceanconnect UK Ltd and another [2010] EWCA Civ 1050, [2010] All ER (D) 110 (Oct)

Under English conflict of law rules, recognition of a right to enforce a maritime lien was a matter to be determined according to the law of the forum. There was no maritime lien of necessity under English law and the categories of maritime lien capable of recognition under English law could only be extended by statute. The mere fact that statute conferred a jurisdiction did not mean that under English law the claim in question assumed the nature of a maritime lien. Whilst in the English courts a supplier of bunkers to a vessel would be entitled to proceed by way of an action in rem, provided that the bunkers constituted necessaries, the supplier would not enjoy a maritime lien as a matter of English law
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher boosts structured finance practice with appointment of Will Sharp

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke grows its life sciences team with new partner hires

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal expands corporate team with twonew appointments

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll