header-logo header-logo

20 June 2014
Issue: 7611 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Conflict of laws

Standard Bank Plc v EFAD Real Estate Company WLL and others [2014] EWHC 1834 (Comm), [2014] All ER (D) 57 (Jun)

In respect of establishing appropriate forum, a claimant had the burden of showing that England was the appropriate forum. Ordinarily, the claimant had to show that England was the natural forum, namely that with which the action had the most real and substantial connection. In determining whether England was the natural forum, the court took account of a wide variety of factors, not only factors concerning convenience and expense (such as the availability of witnesses), but also factors such as the law governing the relevant transaction and the places where the parties resided and respectively carried on business. The court would also have regard to the overall shape of the dispute, and in particular whether part of it would proceed in England in any event. 

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen promotes five lawyers to the partnership

NEWS
A High Court ruling has sent a jolt through the legal profession after a newly qualified solicitor used an internal AI tool to produce court correspondence containing a fabricated legal citation
A significant data privacy ruling has clarified what counts as valid consent under UK data protection law
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
back-to-top-scroll