header-logo header-logo

05 September 2019 / Charles Auld , Kate Harrington
Issue: 7854 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Consecrated ground: whose vault is it?

Who retains ownership of a private burial vault on church grounds? Charles Auld & Harrington examine a novel case
  • Gaining title to land otherwise excluded from the title documents: an ecclesiastical law perspective.
  • Gaining ownership of a burial vault by way of adverse possession.

In the 21st century, can ecclesiastical law concepts be used to gain title to land otherwise excluded from the title documents, and can a church gain ownership of a burial vault by adverse possession? In King and Blair v The Incumbent of the Benefice of Newburn and the Newcastle Diocesan Board of Finance [2019] UKUT 0176 (LC) the Upper Tribunal (UT) had to grapple with these issues, remarking at [18] that ‘there is no recorded authority which is directly determinative of the principal issue raised’. The vault in question lies within the church of Holy Trinity, Dalton, Northumberland, which had been built on land belonging to the local landowner, Edward Collingwood, taking advantage of the Church Building Acts 1818 to 1884.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll