header-logo header-logo

Consecrated ground: whose vault is it?

05 September 2019 / Charles Auld , Kate Harrington
Issue: 7854 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
Who retains ownership of a private burial vault on church grounds? Charles Auld & Harrington examine a novel case
  • Gaining title to land otherwise excluded from the title documents: an ecclesiastical law perspective.
  • Gaining ownership of a burial vault by way of adverse possession.

In the 21st century, can ecclesiastical law concepts be used to gain title to land otherwise excluded from the title documents, and can a church gain ownership of a burial vault by adverse possession? In King and Blair v The Incumbent of the Benefice of Newburn and the Newcastle Diocesan Board of Finance [2019] UKUT 0176 (LC) the Upper Tribunal (UT) had to grapple with these issues, remarking at [18] that ‘there is no recorded authority which is directly determinative of the principal issue raised’. The vault in question lies within the church of Holy Trinity, Dalton, Northumberland, which had been built on land belonging to the local landowner, Edward Collingwood, taking advantage of the Church Building Acts 1818 to 1884.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll