header-logo header-logo

05 September 2019 / Charles Auld , Kate Harrington
Issue: 7854 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Consecrated ground: whose vault is it?

Who retains ownership of a private burial vault on church grounds? Charles Auld & Harrington examine a novel case
  • Gaining title to land otherwise excluded from the title documents: an ecclesiastical law perspective.
  • Gaining ownership of a burial vault by way of adverse possession.

In the 21st century, can ecclesiastical law concepts be used to gain title to land otherwise excluded from the title documents, and can a church gain ownership of a burial vault by adverse possession? In King and Blair v The Incumbent of the Benefice of Newburn and the Newcastle Diocesan Board of Finance [2019] UKUT 0176 (LC) the Upper Tribunal (UT) had to grapple with these issues, remarking at [18] that ‘there is no recorded authority which is directly determinative of the principal issue raised’. The vault in question lies within the church of Holy Trinity, Dalton, Northumberland, which had been built on land belonging to the local landowner, Edward Collingwood, taking advantage of the Church Building Acts 1818 to 1884.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll