header-logo header-logo

06 January 2017 / David Burrows
Issue: 7728 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Family
printer mail-detail

Contempt & court proceedings (Pt 1)

nlj_7728_burrows

The variety of application of the laws of contempt are explained by David Burrows in the first of two articles on contempt in court

  • What is the meaning of contempt in court proceedings: beyond ‘fair and temperate’ criticism?
  • Civil and criminal contempt compared.
  • Contempt and privacy in proceedings involving children and parties lacking capacity.

EU withdrawal (“Brexit”) may engage, and child sexual exploitation engages, two very different forms of contempt. The first raises the question of whether the press has gone beyond fair and temperate criticism of judges. The second asks how far the court can order that an abuse victim remain anonymous. They coalesce over freedom of speech and how far this may be inhibited by committal application or reporting restraint order (RRO). This article considers contempt. Part 2 looks more specifically at privacy and family proceedings.

At one end of the spectrum on 3 November 2016 the Divisional Court (Lord Thomas LCJ, Sir Thomas Etherington MR and Sales LJ) handed down judgment in R (Miller) v The Secretary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll