header-logo header-logo

28 May 2009 / Jonathan Scriven
Issue: 7371 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Contempt of court—ramifications for the exaggerating claimant

Jonathan Scriven reviews Kirk v Walton

In Kirk v Walton [2009] EWHC 703 QB, All ER (D) 70 (Apr) Mrs Kirk issued proceedings in 2004 after sustaining injuries in a road traffic accident on 14 September 2001. Kirk claimed that as a result of her accident she had developed fibromyalgia which resulted in a significant and long-term disability—Kirk complained of difficulty walking, climbing stairs and of occasionally being bedridden. Kirk's pleaded case was in excess of £750,000 and in support of her claim she served a number of documents verified by statements of truth which dealt with the nature and extent of her injuries and disabilities.

Liability was conceded by the defendant's insurers although they had clear doubts as to the genuineness of the claimant's injuries and believed that she was exaggerating both her disability and her consequential claim for damages. The defendant's insurer's paid £25,000 into court in February 2005 and obtained surveillance evidence which showed Kirk driving, walking, standing and carrying shopping in an entirely ordinary manner with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll