header-logo header-logo

28 May 2009 / Jonathan Scriven
Issue: 7371 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Contempt of court—ramifications for the exaggerating claimant

Jonathan Scriven reviews Kirk v Walton

In Kirk v Walton [2009] EWHC 703 QB, All ER (D) 70 (Apr) Mrs Kirk issued proceedings in 2004 after sustaining injuries in a road traffic accident on 14 September 2001. Kirk claimed that as a result of her accident she had developed fibromyalgia which resulted in a significant and long-term disability—Kirk complained of difficulty walking, climbing stairs and of occasionally being bedridden. Kirk's pleaded case was in excess of £750,000 and in support of her claim she served a number of documents verified by statements of truth which dealt with the nature and extent of her injuries and disabilities.

Liability was conceded by the defendant's insurers although they had clear doubts as to the genuineness of the claimant's injuries and believed that she was exaggerating both her disability and her consequential claim for damages. The defendant's insurer's paid £25,000 into court in February 2005 and obtained surveillance evidence which showed Kirk driving, walking, standing and carrying shopping in an entirely ordinary manner with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll