header-logo header-logo

22 July 2016 / Paul Philip
Issue: 7708 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Continuing competence

nlj_7708_philips

Paul Philip explains CPD for a modern profession

The Solicitors Regulation Authority is continuing to reform how it works. We are constantly looking for areas where we can get rid of outdated regulatory burdens and improve public protection.

As part of that reform, we wanted to look at the traditional 16 hours of CPD per year requirement. This approach had not been substantively updated for more than 25 years and had become something of a tick-box exercise. That was not good for the profession or the public.

We are now moving to a more flexible, modern approach. From November this year, solicitors in England and Wales will no longer count CPD hours. Instead, the new approach means they will reflect on their work and choose training that is right for them and their firm. It is about making sure solicitors are at the top of their game: competent, ethical and ready to deliver high-quality services to their clients.

We recognise that every solicitor and firm is different, and that means that they need to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll