header-logo header-logo

22 July 2016 / Paul Philip
Issue: 7708 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Continuing competence

nlj_7708_philips

Paul Philip explains CPD for a modern profession

The Solicitors Regulation Authority is continuing to reform how it works. We are constantly looking for areas where we can get rid of outdated regulatory burdens and improve public protection.

As part of that reform, we wanted to look at the traditional 16 hours of CPD per year requirement. This approach had not been substantively updated for more than 25 years and had become something of a tick-box exercise. That was not good for the profession or the public.

We are now moving to a more flexible, modern approach. From November this year, solicitors in England and Wales will no longer count CPD hours. Instead, the new approach means they will reflect on their work and choose training that is right for them and their firm. It is about making sure solicitors are at the top of their game: competent, ethical and ready to deliver high-quality services to their clients.

We recognise that every solicitor and firm is different, and that means that they need to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll