header-logo header-logo

22 July 2016 / Paul Philip
Issue: 7708 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Continuing competence

nlj_7708_philips

Paul Philip explains CPD for a modern profession

The Solicitors Regulation Authority is continuing to reform how it works. We are constantly looking for areas where we can get rid of outdated regulatory burdens and improve public protection.

As part of that reform, we wanted to look at the traditional 16 hours of CPD per year requirement. This approach had not been substantively updated for more than 25 years and had become something of a tick-box exercise. That was not good for the profession or the public.

We are now moving to a more flexible, modern approach. From November this year, solicitors in England and Wales will no longer count CPD hours. Instead, the new approach means they will reflect on their work and choose training that is right for them and their firm. It is about making sure solicitors are at the top of their game: competent, ethical and ready to deliver high-quality services to their clients.

We recognise that every solicitor and firm is different, and that means that they need to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll