header-logo header-logo

07 July 2011
Issue: 7473 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Contract

Gard Marine & Energy Ltd v Tunnicliffe [2011] EWHC 1658 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 03 (Jul)

It was settled law that the correct approach to construction of a written contract was, first, that one was seeking to “ascertain the meaning which the document would convey to a reasonable person having all the background knowledge which would reasonably have been available to the parties in the situation in which they were at the time of the contract”. Secondly, in the context of a reinsurance contract, and in particular one expressed to be “subject to all terms, clauses, and conditions as Original and to follow the Original in every respect ...”, the factual matrix included the terms of and circumstances surrounding the underlying policy. Thirdly, the factual matrix would also include evidence about relevant market practices, which were widespread but not universal, if the existence of such practices was part of the background known to each party. Further, if the parties had used terms which bore not only an ordinary meaning and acceptation, but also one peculiar to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll