header-logo header-logo

28 June 2007 / Byron James
Issue: 7279 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Controlled abuse

What role should ex parte applications play in domestic violence cases? Byron James reports

It is disturbing to those who deal with domestic violence just how cinematic horror can so often be combined with gritty day-to-day reality. The extraordinary amount of people affected by domestic violence is well known. There is a wide spectrum of “abusers” in domestic violence: from those who are violent on a daily basis right through to those who harass and intimidate because they cannot let go of a former relationship.

A controlling relationship can often transform into an abusive one. Violence is often accompanied by emotional, psychological and financial abuse. It should follow, therefore, that a main part of the injunctive relief available should be to recognise how hard it is for those under a controlling and abusive relationship to speak out, to seek help and, ultimately, try to break free.

WITHOUT NOTICE

The injunctive relief available under Pt IV of the Family Law Act 1996 (FLA 1996) can be the way out for many of these victims. The main

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll