header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
04 August 2011 / Sarah Watson
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Features , Public , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

The cornrow row

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Sarah Watson assesses the lawfulness of a school’s ban on cornrows

In G (by his litigation friend) v The Head Teacher and Governors of St Gregory’s Catholic Science College [2011] EWHC 1452 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 113 (Jun), the High Court considered the lawfulness of a school’s ban on boys wearing cornrows (hair braids), which the claimant (“G”) contended was discriminatory on grounds of race and sex. The school’s policy was considered under the Equality Act 2010. The relevant sections were stated to be no different in their substantive effect from the previous related sections of the Race Relations Act 1976 and the Sex Discrimination Act 1975.

Background facts

G is of African-Caribbean ethnicity. In accordance with his family tradition he has never cut his hair and it is kept in cornrows. G was due to commence his secondary education at St Gregory’s Catholic Science College (“the school”) in September 2009. The school’s uniform and appearance policy required boys to have a “short back and sides” haircut. Girls were permitted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll