A recent news story “Willers v Joyce: Malicious prosecution extended” (NLJ, 22 July 2016, p 4) stated that the decision in Willers v Joyce was made with a 5:2 majority when it was in fact a 5:4 majority. Also, as Mr Willers’ appeal was against a strike out it proceeded on the basis of assumed facts. The news story and related feature, “A firm foundation?” (NLJ, 29 July 2016, p 16) have been corrected to reflect this. Our apologies for any confusion.
11 August 2016
Correction
MOVERS & SHAKERS
Ogier—Martin Livingston
Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=7bf1005b_1)
Blake Morgan—47 promotions
Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices
NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
