header-logo header-logo

A costly mistake

28 October 2011 / Ian Pegram , Lista M Cannon
Issue: 7487 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Lista Cannon & Ian Pegram note the important lessons to emerge from the FSA’s recent activity

The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) issued its largest ever fine for financial crime systems and controls failures on 21 July 2011. The FSA fined Willis Limited, the UK arm of the world’s third largest insurance and reinsurance broker, £6.895m.

While the present action was pursued under the UK’s financial regulatory framework, the FSA’s reasoning provides important guidance to businesses in all sectors on how the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) may assess whether anti-bribery procedures are “adequate” for the purpose of the Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010).

Background

The FSA examined Willis’s policies to counter the risks of corruption associated with making payments to overseas third parties who assisted Willis in winning business from overseas clients.

While the FSA acknowledged that Willis had in place a number of policies and procedures aimed at limiting and detecting corruption issues, it found that Willis had not taken reasonable care to establish and maintain effective anti-bribery systems

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll