header-logo header-logo

A costly mistake

28 October 2011 / Ian Pegram , Lista M Cannon
Issue: 7487 / Categories: Features , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Lista Cannon & Ian Pegram note the important lessons to emerge from the FSA’s recent activity

The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) issued its largest ever fine for financial crime systems and controls failures on 21 July 2011. The FSA fined Willis Limited, the UK arm of the world’s third largest insurance and reinsurance broker, £6.895m.

While the present action was pursued under the UK’s financial regulatory framework, the FSA’s reasoning provides important guidance to businesses in all sectors on how the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) may assess whether anti-bribery procedures are “adequate” for the purpose of the Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010).

Background

The FSA examined Willis’s policies to counter the risks of corruption associated with making payments to overseas third parties who assisted Willis in winning business from overseas clients.

While the FSA acknowledged that Willis had in place a number of policies and procedures aimed at limiting and detecting corruption issues, it found that Willis had not taken reasonable care to establish and maintain effective anti-bribery systems

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll