header-logo header-logo

Costs

28 October 2011
Issue: 7487 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Motto and others v Trafigura Ltd and another [2011] EWCA Civ 1150, [2011] All ER (D) 138 (Oct)

In principle, and subject to the tests of reasonableness, proportionality and, where it applied, necessity, a claimant was entitled to recover the costs of advising and taking instruction on a settlement agreement and then in distributing any payout, as those plainly formed part of the costs of proceedings. However, it was open to a party to argue, and for a court to find, that the parties had agreed a departure from the normal rule. It was also clear that a judge could conclude that there should be a cut-off date after which no further costs of distribution could be claimed, although care had to be taken not to penalise a claimant unfairly by depriving him of the right to recover costs which had been reasonably and necessarily incurred solely because they were incurred later than they should have been.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll