header-logo header-logo

Costs

28 October 2011
Issue: 7487 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Motto and others v Trafigura Ltd and another [2011] EWCA Civ 1150, [2011] All ER (D) 138 (Oct)

In principle, and subject to the tests of reasonableness, proportionality and, where it applied, necessity, a claimant was entitled to recover the costs of advising and taking instruction on a settlement agreement and then in distributing any payout, as those plainly formed part of the costs of proceedings. However, it was open to a party to argue, and for a court to find, that the parties had agreed a departure from the normal rule. It was also clear that a judge could conclude that there should be a cut-off date after which no further costs of distribution could be claimed, although care had to be taken not to penalise a claimant unfairly by depriving him of the right to recover costs which had been reasonably and necessarily incurred solely because they were incurred later than they should have been.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll