header-logo header-logo

10 May 2013
Issue: 7559 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs

Heron v TNT (UK) Ltd and another [2013] EWCA Civ 469, [2013] All ER (D) 28 (May)

It was settled law that a non-party costs order could be made against legal representatives, but that, in every case, such an order was exceptional. Generally speaking, the discretion would not be exercised against “pure funders”. However, where a non-party not merely funded the proceedings, but substantially also controlled or at any rate was to benefit from them, justice would ordinarily require that, if the proceedings failed, he would pay the successful party’s costs. The non-party in those cases was not so much facilitating access to justice by the party funded, as himself gaining access to justice for his own purposes, and he himself was “the real party” to the litigation. A solicitor was entitled to act on a conditional fee agreement for the impecunious client who it knew or suspected would not be able to pay its own, or the other side’s costs, if unsuccessful. As far as the other side was concerned, whether the solicitor had negligently failed to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll