header-logo header-logo

10 May 2013
Issue: 7559 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs

Heron v TNT (UK) Ltd and another [2013] EWCA Civ 469, [2013] All ER (D) 28 (May)

It was settled law that a non-party costs order could be made against legal representatives, but that, in every case, such an order was exceptional. Generally speaking, the discretion would not be exercised against “pure funders”. However, where a non-party not merely funded the proceedings, but substantially also controlled or at any rate was to benefit from them, justice would ordinarily require that, if the proceedings failed, he would pay the successful party’s costs. The non-party in those cases was not so much facilitating access to justice by the party funded, as himself gaining access to justice for his own purposes, and he himself was “the real party” to the litigation. A solicitor was entitled to act on a conditional fee agreement for the impecunious client who it knew or suspected would not be able to pay its own, or the other side’s costs, if unsuccessful. As far as the other side was concerned, whether the solicitor had negligently failed to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll