header-logo header-logo

Costs

10 May 2013
Issue: 7559 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Heron v TNT (UK) Ltd and another [2013] EWCA Civ 469, [2013] All ER (D) 28 (May)

It was settled law that a non-party costs order could be made against legal representatives, but that, in every case, such an order was exceptional. Generally speaking, the discretion would not be exercised against “pure funders”. However, where a non-party not merely funded the proceedings, but substantially also controlled or at any rate was to benefit from them, justice would ordinarily require that, if the proceedings failed, he would pay the successful party’s costs. The non-party in those cases was not so much facilitating access to justice by the party funded, as himself gaining access to justice for his own purposes, and he himself was “the real party” to the litigation. A solicitor was entitled to act on a conditional fee agreement for the impecunious client who it knew or suspected would not be able to pay its own, or the other side’s costs, if unsuccessful. As far as the other side was concerned, whether the solicitor had negligently failed to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll