header-logo header-logo

31 July 2015
Issue: 7663 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs

Coventry and others v Lawrence and another [2015] UKSC 50, [2015] All ER (D) 234 (Jul)

Following proceedings in which the appellant had been the successful party, the respondents challenged the basis of the costs order in so far as it related to an order for payment of all or part of the success fee payable by the appellants under a conditional fee agreement and the payment of after the event insurance premia. The Supreme Court held that the scheme under the Access to Justice Act 1999 for the recovery of costs was not incompatible with either Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights or Art 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll