header-logo header-logo

17 June 2016
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs

Parker v Butler [2016] EWHC 1251 (QB), [2016] All ER (D) 24 (Jun)

The Queen’s Bench Division held that, for the purposes of the qualified one way costs shifting (QOCS) regime, any appeal which concerned the outcome of a claim for damages for personal injuries or the procedure by which it was to be determined was part of the proceedings as defined in CPR 44.13. Therefore, an order for costs against the claimant in favour of a defendant would only be enforceable to the extent permitted by the QOCS regime.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Church Court Chambers—Maryam Syed KC

Church Court Chambers—Maryam Syed KC

Church Court Chambers welcomes Maryam Syed KC

Devonshires—Sean Garbutt

Devonshires—Sean Garbutt

Devonshires strengthens construction team with appointment of partner Sean Garbutt

Thackray Williams—Alexandra Hubbard

Thackray Williams—Alexandra Hubbard

Thackray Williams strengthens employment team with dual-qualified solicitor

NEWS
Should every solicitor found to have acted dishonestly face automatic striking off? The answer, argues John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke LLP in NLJ this week, is no 
Winning an arbitral award against a state is one thing; enforcing it is another
Can government success in court tell us whether the rule of law is healthy? 
Poorly drafted dispute resolution clauses can trigger litigation before the real dispute is even addressed
As cryptocurrency becomes mainstream, family lawyers are increasingly confronting the challenges it creates on divorce
back-to-top-scroll