header-logo header-logo

Costs

03 March 2011
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Amin and another v Mullings and another [2011] EWHC 278 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 250 (Feb)

It was clear from CPR 45.15(6)(b) that “at trial” meant at a contested hearing. As was clear from CPR 45.17(1)(a) and (b)(i), there was a distinction between a trial and the date fixed for the commencement of the trial. Further, there was a distinction between the conclusion of a claim after and before a trial had commenced. Settlement before a trial commenced, and conclusion by settlement, after a trial had commenced, could both occur on the date fixed for the trial.

The trigger for entitlement to a 100% uplift in fees was not a settlement on a particular date but a settlement or conclusion after a trial, defined as a hearing, had commenced. It would be straining the use of language to say that a trial had “commenced” after the beginning of the day fixed for trial although the hearing had not started. The language of CPR 45.16(1) dealing with the percentage increase in solicitor’s fees was clear.

The entitlement to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll