header-logo header-logo

14 June 2012 / William Gibson
Issue: 7518 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Costs conundrum (3)

In the third article in a special NLJ costs series, William Gibson tackles client billing

Many legal practitioners, once the satisfying glow of qualification has passed, do not put costs practice or billing high on their list of enthusiasms and why should they? Most firms employ accounts departments and an increasing amount of control is exercised by practice managers or chief executives.

 
What these administrative people do not do is appear on the front line, face- to-face with clients or opponents who are not slow to take advantage of slips, errors or obscure technicalities when money is at stake.

The SRA Code of Conduct 2011 (the code) “does not deal with the form a bill can take, final or interim bills, when they can be delivered and how a firm can sue on a bill”. The reason for exclusion is apparently because “these matters are covered by complex legal provisions” (see guidance note 30 to r 2.03 of the Code).

Those complexities, of
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll