header-logo header-logo

Costs—Order for costs—Discretion

29 November 2013
Issue: 7586 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Threlfall v ECD Insight Ltd and another [2013] EWCA Civ 1444, [2013] All ER (D) 195 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Richards, Tomlinson & Lewison LJJ, 29 Oct 2013

The Court of Appeal has considered the principles of making costs awards against non-parties to litigation.

Clive Freedman QC and Sam Neaman (instructed by Penningtons Manches LLP) for the claimant. Peter Shaw and Conn MacEvilly (under the Direct Access Scheme) for the defendants.

The claimant had been employed by the defendant company. He brought an action against the company and its sole director and shareholder, W (the second defendant) for breach of his employment contract. The company denied those allegations and counterclaimed for breaches of the claimant’s obligations of fidelity and breaches of his restrictive covenants. 

W was joined to the action because any order in the claimant’s favour for specific performance of his entitlement to the 20% equity sought by the claimant would have either required a transfer of shares by W himself, or would have had to have taken the form of requiring

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll