header-logo header-logo

Costs—Order for costs—Discretion

29 November 2013
Issue: 7586 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Threlfall v ECD Insight Ltd and another [2013] EWCA Civ 1444, [2013] All ER (D) 195 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Richards, Tomlinson & Lewison LJJ, 29 Oct 2013

The Court of Appeal has considered the principles of making costs awards against non-parties to litigation.

Clive Freedman QC and Sam Neaman (instructed by Penningtons Manches LLP) for the claimant. Peter Shaw and Conn MacEvilly (under the Direct Access Scheme) for the defendants.

The claimant had been employed by the defendant company. He brought an action against the company and its sole director and shareholder, W (the second defendant) for breach of his employment contract. The company denied those allegations and counterclaimed for breaches of the claimant’s obligations of fidelity and breaches of his restrictive covenants. 

W was joined to the action because any order in the claimant’s favour for specific performance of his entitlement to the 20% equity sought by the claimant would have either required a transfer of shares by W himself, or would have had to have taken the form of requiring

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll