header-logo header-logo

29 November 2013
Issue: 7586 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Costs—Order for costs—Discretion

Threlfall v ECD Insight Ltd and another [2013] EWCA Civ 1444, [2013] All ER (D) 195 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Richards, Tomlinson & Lewison LJJ, 29 Oct 2013

The Court of Appeal has considered the principles of making costs awards against non-parties to litigation.

Clive Freedman QC and Sam Neaman (instructed by Penningtons Manches LLP) for the claimant. Peter Shaw and Conn MacEvilly (under the Direct Access Scheme) for the defendants.

The claimant had been employed by the defendant company. He brought an action against the company and its sole director and shareholder, W (the second defendant) for breach of his employment contract. The company denied those allegations and counterclaimed for breaches of the claimant’s obligations of fidelity and breaches of his restrictive covenants. 

W was joined to the action because any order in the claimant’s favour for specific performance of his entitlement to the 20% equity sought by the claimant would have either required a transfer of shares by W himself, or would have had to have taken the form of requiring

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
Could an online LLM in Commercial and Technology Law expand your career options?
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
back-to-top-scroll