header-logo header-logo

Costs—Order for costs—Discretion

29 November 2013
Issue: 7586 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Threlfall v ECD Insight Ltd and another [2013] EWCA Civ 1444, [2013] All ER (D) 195 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Richards, Tomlinson & Lewison LJJ, 29 Oct 2013

The Court of Appeal has considered the principles of making costs awards against non-parties to litigation.

Clive Freedman QC and Sam Neaman (instructed by Penningtons Manches LLP) for the claimant. Peter Shaw and Conn MacEvilly (under the Direct Access Scheme) for the defendants.

The claimant had been employed by the defendant company. He brought an action against the company and its sole director and shareholder, W (the second defendant) for breach of his employment contract. The company denied those allegations and counterclaimed for breaches of the claimant’s obligations of fidelity and breaches of his restrictive covenants. 

W was joined to the action because any order in the claimant’s favour for specific performance of his entitlement to the 20% equity sought by the claimant would have either required a transfer of shares by W himself, or would have had to have taken the form of requiring

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll