header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
04 November 2022 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 8001 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Costs post-Belsner

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
99933
Dominic Regan provides a cut out & keep guide to billing obligations post-Belsner

Understandably, the conjoined judgments of the Court of Appeal in  Belsner v CAM Legal Services Ltd and Karatysz v SGI Legal LLP handed down last Thursday morning have given practitioners much to think about. I attended all of the February hearing in Belsner and segments of the October rerun. I shall be writing more—much more—on this subject.

There is one immediate point to act upon and that is derived from Karatysz. The case considered ‘What is a bill?’

The court said that properly drawn bills must specify the agreed charges and/or amounts that the solicitors intended to levy, together with full details of disbursements. The bill delivers to the client a comprehensive account of the financials. It is not just a statement of what the client is being asked to pay. Sums received from the defendant are to be included.

The bill should identify the following elements:

  • base costs;
  • the amount of any success fee; and
  • disbursements.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll