header-logo header-logo

04 November 2022 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 8001 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Costs post-Belsner

99933
Dominic Regan provides a cut out & keep guide to billing obligations post-Belsner

Understandably, the conjoined judgments of the Court of Appeal in  Belsner v CAM Legal Services Ltd and Karatysz v SGI Legal LLP handed down last Thursday morning have given practitioners much to think about. I attended all of the February hearing in Belsner and segments of the October rerun. I shall be writing more—much more—on this subject.

There is one immediate point to act upon and that is derived from Karatysz. The case considered ‘What is a bill?’

The court said that properly drawn bills must specify the agreed charges and/or amounts that the solicitors intended to levy, together with full details of disbursements. The bill delivers to the client a comprehensive account of the financials. It is not just a statement of what the client is being asked to pay. Sums received from the defendant are to be included.

The bill should identify the following elements:

  • base costs;
  • the amount of any success fee; and
  • disbursements.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll