header-logo header-logo

Costs post-Belsner

04 November 2022 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 8001 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail
99933
Dominic Regan provides a cut out & keep guide to billing obligations post-Belsner

Understandably, the conjoined judgments of the Court of Appeal in  Belsner v CAM Legal Services Ltd and Karatysz v SGI Legal LLP handed down last Thursday morning have given practitioners much to think about. I attended all of the February hearing in Belsner and segments of the October rerun. I shall be writing more—much more—on this subject.

There is one immediate point to act upon and that is derived from Karatysz. The case considered ‘What is a bill?’

The court said that properly drawn bills must specify the agreed charges and/or amounts that the solicitors intended to levy, together with full details of disbursements. The bill delivers to the client a comprehensive account of the financials. It is not just a statement of what the client is being asked to pay. Sums received from the defendant are to be included.

The bill should identify the following elements:

  • base costs;
  • the amount of any success fee; and
  • disbursements.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll