header-logo header-logo

25 April 2013
Issue: 7557 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Costs reforms

 “Variable” form of one-way qualified costs-shifting for defamation & privacy cases?

Both claimants and defendants in defamation and privacy cases could use a “variable” form of one-way qualified costs-shifting, the Civil Justice Council (CJC) has recommended, in a report on costs protection published last week, ahead of measures in the Defamation Bill coming into effect.

Currently, many defamation and privacy cases are funded by conditional fee agreements. The government delayed implementing its conditional fee reforms to this area of law in the light of the Leveson Report, and asked the CJC to look into what costs protection regime could apply.

Its other recommendations include: greater judicial case management, with specialist judges and early intervention; agreement on circumstances in which parties might lose costs protection; drawing up realistic budgets; and allowing the courts to continue to exercise cost-capping powers.

Issue: 7557 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll