header-logo header-logo

Could “Alternative” be the new norm in Family Law?

17 June 2020
Issue: 7891 / Categories: Media Partners , Features , Family , ADR , Profession
printer mail-detail
22827
The Family Online Mediation and Arbitration Service (FOMAS

Although an option for dealing with family disputes for a number of years, uptake has been relatively low. There are of course obvious reasons for this such as the perceived high cost of Private FDRs and Arbitration, reluctance to move away from traditional court proceedings and a general lack of detailed understanding of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) options.

Prior to the Covid19 pandemic, the family courts in England and Wales were already under significant pressure and parties were subject to lengthy delays in getting a hearing date. Unfortunately, due to Covid19 pandemic these delays can be expected to increase. Therefore, there is now a further increased importance in parties attempting to resolve their financial and children disputes via ADR, thus saving valuable court time for cases involving vulnerable people or where judicial intervention is necessary.

It was with these points in mind that The Family Online Mediation and Arbitration Service (FOMAS) set its

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Arc Pensions Law—Ian D’Costa

Pensions firm welcomes legal director in London

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Shakespeare Martineau—Jonathan Warren

Real estate disputes team strengthened by London partner hire

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Morgan Lewis—Christian Tuddenham

Litigation partner joins disputes team in London

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll