header-logo header-logo

Could “Alternative” be the new norm in Family Law?

17 June 2020
Issue: 7891 / Categories: Media Partners , Features , Family , ADR , Profession
printer mail-detail
22827
The Family Online Mediation and Arbitration Service (FOMAS

Although an option for dealing with family disputes for a number of years, uptake has been relatively low. There are of course obvious reasons for this such as the perceived high cost of Private FDRs and Arbitration, reluctance to move away from traditional court proceedings and a general lack of detailed understanding of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) options.

Prior to the Covid19 pandemic, the family courts in England and Wales were already under significant pressure and parties were subject to lengthy delays in getting a hearing date. Unfortunately, due to Covid19 pandemic these delays can be expected to increase. Therefore, there is now a further increased importance in parties attempting to resolve their financial and children disputes via ADR, thus saving valuable court time for cases involving vulnerable people or where judicial intervention is necessary.

It was with these points in mind that The Family Online Mediation and Arbitration Service (FOMAS) set its

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll