header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
04 August 2017 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Could Baron Hague replace Theresa May?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7757_backpage

Convention says no, but theoretically a life or hereditary life peer could become prime minister, as Alec Samuels explains

The tenure of Theresa May as prime minister appears to be uncertain and limited, and she is most unlikely to lead the Conservative Party into the next general election. Could William Hague, or for that matter any hereditary or life peer, become Prime Minister? The answer is theoretically yes, though by convention the Prime Minister sits in the Commons. Disraeli was elevated to the Lords while Prime Minister in 1876. Lord Salisbury was the last Prime Minister in the Lords, retiring from office in 1902. Lord Home emerged as leader of the Conservative Party in 1963, promptly disclaimed his hereditary peerage, secured a seat in the Commons and duly became Prime Minister. Lord Hailsham had indicated his willingness to do the same had he so emerged.

Disclaimer

An hereditary peerage may be disclaimed by a succeeding peer under the Peerage Act 1963 s 1. This legislation was largely due to the efforts of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll