header-logo header-logo

04 August 2017 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Could Baron Hague replace Theresa May?

nlj_7757_backpage

Convention says no, but theoretically a life or hereditary life peer could become prime minister, as Alec Samuels explains

The tenure of Theresa May as prime minister appears to be uncertain and limited, and she is most unlikely to lead the Conservative Party into the next general election. Could William Hague, or for that matter any hereditary or life peer, become Prime Minister? The answer is theoretically yes, though by convention the Prime Minister sits in the Commons. Disraeli was elevated to the Lords while Prime Minister in 1876. Lord Salisbury was the last Prime Minister in the Lords, retiring from office in 1902. Lord Home emerged as leader of the Conservative Party in 1963, promptly disclaimed his hereditary peerage, secured a seat in the Commons and duly became Prime Minister. Lord Hailsham had indicated his willingness to do the same had he so emerged.

Disclaimer

An hereditary peerage may be disclaimed by a succeeding peer under the Peerage Act 1963 s 1. This legislation was largely due to the efforts of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll