header-logo header-logo

Could Baron Hague replace Theresa May?

04 August 2017 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
nlj_7757_backpage

Convention says no, but theoretically a life or hereditary life peer could become prime minister, as Alec Samuels explains

The tenure of Theresa May as prime minister appears to be uncertain and limited, and she is most unlikely to lead the Conservative Party into the next general election. Could William Hague, or for that matter any hereditary or life peer, become Prime Minister? The answer is theoretically yes, though by convention the Prime Minister sits in the Commons. Disraeli was elevated to the Lords while Prime Minister in 1876. Lord Salisbury was the last Prime Minister in the Lords, retiring from office in 1902. Lord Home emerged as leader of the Conservative Party in 1963, promptly disclaimed his hereditary peerage, secured a seat in the Commons and duly became Prime Minister. Lord Hailsham had indicated his willingness to do the same had he so emerged.

Disclaimer

An hereditary peerage may be disclaimed by a succeeding peer under the Peerage Act 1963 s 1. This legislation was largely due to the efforts of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll