header-logo header-logo

04 August 2017 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Could Baron Hague replace Theresa May?

nlj_7757_backpage

Convention says no, but theoretically a life or hereditary life peer could become prime minister, as Alec Samuels explains

The tenure of Theresa May as prime minister appears to be uncertain and limited, and she is most unlikely to lead the Conservative Party into the next general election. Could William Hague, or for that matter any hereditary or life peer, become Prime Minister? The answer is theoretically yes, though by convention the Prime Minister sits in the Commons. Disraeli was elevated to the Lords while Prime Minister in 1876. Lord Salisbury was the last Prime Minister in the Lords, retiring from office in 1902. Lord Home emerged as leader of the Conservative Party in 1963, promptly disclaimed his hereditary peerage, secured a seat in the Commons and duly became Prime Minister. Lord Hailsham had indicated his willingness to do the same had he so emerged.

Disclaimer

An hereditary peerage may be disclaimed by a succeeding peer under the Peerage Act 1963 s 1. This legislation was largely due to the efforts of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll