header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Could do better

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
16 March 2007 / Kim Fellowes
Issue: 7264 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail

Kim Fellowes discusses common problems in the child support system and offers some practical solutions

The process of recovering unpaid child support is here to stay, in one form or another. The two current systems introduced under the Child Support Act 1991 (CSA 1991) and the Child Support, Pensions and Social Security Act 2000 (CSPSSA 2000) will continue until the new organisation, the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (C-MEC) replaces the Child Support Agency (CSA). The anticipated final transition of existing cases to C-MEC is not until 2013. As such, family lawyers ignore at their peril child support issues that arise in respect of their caseload.

The assessment stage

In child support cases, the financial disclosure requested from a non-resident parent (NRP) is wholly inadequate, compared with the full and frank disclosure provided in the court process. There is an additional problem as the disclosure provided by one party is not provided to the other, which means the parent with care (PWC) has little opportunity to ascertain if the information used by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: The pension split at 25
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
NLJ this week: Exclusion zone?
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
NLJ this week: When silence speaks volumes
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
Public Accounts Committee warn of ‘extinction’ risk for legal aid
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
NLJ this week: The insider returns
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll