header-logo header-logo

08 November 2013
Issue: 7583 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Counsel

McCarthy v Visitors to the Inns of Court [2013] EWHC 3253 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 310 (Oct)

The claimant barrister was found guilty of producing forged documents and subsequently disbarred. The defendant Visitors to the Inns of Court (the visitors) upheld that decision. The claimant sought judicial review on the ground that the Bar Standards Board (BSB) had failed to disclose a draft witness statement. The Administrative Court, in dismissing the application, held that the BSB had been obliged to serve the draft and its failure to do so had led unfairness in the approach of the visitors. However, the decision would not be quashed because there had been no real possibility of any alternative result.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Shakespeare Martineau—David Vaughan

Shakespeare Martineau—David Vaughan

Shakespeare Martineau appoints new London office head as firm continues investment in capital

Browne Jacobson—Kevin Moore

Browne Jacobson—Kevin Moore

Browne Jacobson strengthens All-Island life sciences platform with appointment of leading Galway MedTech lawyer

Clarke Willmott—Latitude Law

Clarke Willmott—Latitude Law

National law firm strengthens commercial offering with acquisition of leading immigration practice

NEWS
Mr Justice Nicklin’s decision to order costs on an indemnity basis may be a ‘significant win’ but it’s still ‘far from game, set and match’ for Associated Newspapers, a former costs judge has said
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners
back-to-top-scroll